PV and Solar Power | Free Solar Farms

Pricing PV Systems and Financing Ideas

The cost of a PV system depends on the system size, equipment options (panels and inverters), permitting costs, and labor costs. Prices vary depending on other factors as well, such as whether your home is new, where the system is installed on your premise, the PV manufacturer, and other factors.

For example, the total average cost of an installed residential PV system under the California Solar Initiative is $8.70 per Watt (including installation, as of January 2011). That translates to about $34,800 for a four-kilowatt system, the average size of a residential installation. To see real average cost data for solar projects installed near you, visit the Find a Contractor page on California Solar Statistics.

Because of the declining rebates in the California solar programs, the sooner you install your system, the better your incentive and rebate will be. Click here to view the current rebate levels at the CSI Trigger Tracker.

Depending on your pre-installation electricity usage, you can expect rates of return between 9% and 14% on your PV installation. Please see Calculators to estimate the full cost of your solar system. For example, using the Clean Power Estimator, a south-facing three-kilowatt system installed at a 30-degree angle on a single-family home with a utility bill of $180 per month in San Francisco would cost a customer an estimated $19,282 with a payback period of 12 years.

  • Is there a buy-out provision?
  • What happens if the contractor goes out of business?
  • Is there opportunity to pay some up front and some later?

Financing a Solar Energy System

Solar customers have multiple options when financing their solar energy systems:

Home Equity Loans - Many customers go through their commercial lenders to finance their solar energy systems, and home equity loans have been the most common method for homeowners to purchase their solar systems. To find out more about home equity loans, you can contact your local providers, though many solar contractors have partnerships with existing lenders.

Power Purchase Agreements - Under a “PPA,” a third party owns and maintains the customer solar system, selling the kilowatt-hours back to the customer. Thus, customers who opt for a solar PPAtypically have low capital costs and pay only for the electricity their solar systems generate. Both SolarTech and the Rahus Institute offer helpful guides and additional information on solar PPAs.

Solar Leases - By leasing a solar system, customers can get the benefits of owning a solar system without the capital costs. Solar customers opting for solar leases simply rent the solar system from a company as they would any other home appliance while earning the benefits from the electricity the system produces. Solar leases are attractive options for home or business owners that plan to at their business or office for less than five years. For more reading, Mother Jones Magazine has an excellent February 2010 article titled: “If You Can’t Afford to Buy a PV System, Consider Renting One“.

Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) - Solar customers likewise may have the option to finance their solar systems through their local governments. Local governments can create property tax finance districts to issue loans for energy efficiency and renewable energy such as solar PV systems. PACE allows local governments to provide low-cost, 20-year loans to eligible property owners seeking to install these technologies. The solar customer then pays more on the annual property tax bill to repay the loan. The loans are permanently fixed to real property, so that residents need not worry about their system’s break-even point and can pass the loan payments on to subsequent buyers of the property. Renewable Funding offers helpful additional information about PACE, and presently PACE programs are in place in the following communities:

Note that affordable housing customers that wish to deploy solar systems have different pricing mechanisms and incentives with the California Solar Initiative through the Single Family Affordable Solar Housing (SASH) and Multi-Family Affordable Solar Housing Programs (MASH). For more information and program eligibility, please see theAffordable Housing section.

The California Solar Initiative Incentives Explained

Because of the triggering mechanism in the California Solar Initiative, as explained below, the sooner you purchase and install your system, the better your incentive and rebate will be. Incentive amounts will likewise vary depending on your solar system size, system performance, customer class, utility provider, and program deployment phase.Click here to view the current incentive and tariff levels.

The California Solar Initiative offers financial incentives for solar installations based on the expected performance of a given solar installation. The expected performance is derived from the size of the solar array, and also takes into consideration the angle and location of the system installation. For larger systems, the incentive is based on the actual performance of the system over the first five years.

The incentive level available to a given project is determined by currently available incentive in each utility territory for each customer class. The CSI was designed so that the incentive level decreases over ten steps, after which it goes to $0, as the total demand for solar energy systems grows.

The CPUC divided the overall goal of 1,750 megawatts by these ten declining steps. Each step has megawatts allocated to each Program Administrator and customer class, residential and non-residential (a combination of commercial and government/non-profit). Once the total number of megawatts for each step is reached within a particular customer class, the Program Administrator moves to the next step and offers a lower incentive level for that class. Therefore, high commercial demand in SCE’s territory will not lower the incentive level offered to PG&E’s residential customers, and so on. Figure 1 offers a visual explanation of the increasing megawatt installations and decreasing incentive levels over the life of the program. The orange box in each “Incentive Step Level” represents the available megawatts at that incentive value. The yellow box represents the cumulative installed megawatts as the program proceeds through the steps.

graph from CPUC

The California Solar Initiative pays solar consumers their incentive either all-at-once for smaller systems, or over the course of five years for larger systems. The program’s two incentive payment types are:

  • Expected Performance-Based Buy-Down, or EPBB:
    In 2008-9, systems smaller than 50kW in capacity can receive a one-time, up-front incentive based on expected performance, and calculated by equipment ratings and installation factors (geographic location, tilt and shading). EPBB payments are provided on a $ per watt basis. EPBB is available for systems under 30 KW after 2010. Systems eligible for EPBB can choose to opt-in to the PBI system described below.

  • Performance Based Incentive, or PBI:
    The PBI pays out an incentive, based on actual kWh production, over a period of five years. PBI payments are provided on a $ per kilowatt-hour basis. As of 2010 all systems over 30 kW must be on PBI, though sized system can elect to take PBI.

Other Incentives

Solar customers should also check with their local government agencies for additional programs, incentives, or information. See the Solar Incentives by Utility page for a full list of California solar programs, or click here to Find Your Utility.

Solar Incentive Programs by Utility

Check the links below for a complete list of solar incentive programs in California. If you are not sure of your utility provider, you can find your utility company here.

Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs)

Electric Service Providers

An Electric Service Provider (ESP) is a non-utility entity that offers “Direct Access” electric service to customers located within the service territory of an investor-owned utility. ESPs are required to register with the California Public Utilities Commission, which in September 2001 suspended the option of IOU customers to switch to Direct Access.

APS Energy Services Company, Inc.
Renewable Energy Services

Publicly Owned Load Serving Entities and Utilities

Alameda Municipal Power
AMP Solar Rebate Program

Anaheim, City of 
Public Utilities Department
Solar Advantage

Azusa Light and Water
Solar Partnership Program

Banning, City of
Electric Department
Residential and Commercial Photovoltaic Incentives

Biggs Municipal Utilities
City of Gridley Solar Photovoltaic Buy Down

Burbank Water and Power
BWP Solar Support Rebate Program

CCSF (City and County of San Francisco)
Go Solar SF – Solar Incentive Program

Colton Electric Utility Department
Solar Electric System Rebate Program

Corona, City of 
Department of Water and Power
Electric Rebate Program

Glendale Water and Power
GWP Solar Solutions

Gridley Electric Utility 
City of Gridley Solar Photovoltaic Buy Down

Healdsburg, City of, Electric Department
City of Healdsburg SB1 Solar Program

Hercules Municipal Utility
Solar Electric Buy-Down Program

Imperial Irrigation District (IID)
Solar/PV Solutions

Lassen Municipal Utility District
Lassen MUD Solar Program

Lodi Electric Utility
Lodi Solar Rebate Program

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (LADWP)
Residential Solar Power Incentive
Commercial Solar Power Incentive

Merced Irrigation District (MeID)
Solar Photovoltaic Buydown Program

Modesto Irrigation District (MID)
MID Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Incentive Programs

Moreno Valley Utility (MVU)
MVU Solar Incentive Program

Palo Alto, City of
Photovoltaic Partners Program

Pasadena Water and Power
Pasadena Solar Initiative

Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility
Solar Incentive Program

Redding Electric Utility
Earth Advantage Rebates Program

Riverside, City of 
Public Utilities Department
Residential Photovoltaic Rebate Program
Business Solar Photovoltaic Rebate Program

Roseville Electric
Solar Rebates

Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) 
Solar Water Heater Rebates
Solar Power for Your Home
SMUD SolarSmartSM Homes

Silicon Valley Power (SVP)
Residential Solar Electric Rebates
Commercial Solar Electric Rebates

Truckee Donner Public Utilities District
Photovoltaic Buy-Down Program

Turlock Irrigation District (TID)
TID Solar Photovoltaic Rebate Program

Ukiah, City of, Electric Utilities Division
City of Ukiah Photovoltaic Buy Down Program

Vernon, City of
Municipal Light Department
Net Metering

Rural Electric Cooperatives

Lawrenceville School’s solar power array is among the largest installed at a U.S. school

Lawrenceville School, a centuries-old boarding school in Lawrenceville, N.J., is home to 6.1 megawatts of high-performance solar panels from SolarWorld, the largest U.S. solar manufacturer for more than 35 years. The sprawling photovoltaic system, ground-mounted on 30 acres of school-owned farm land, is believed to be the largest installed at a U.S. primary or secondary school. It will generate enough electricity to offset 90 percent of the high school’s annual power needs and provide a centerpiece to the school’s holistic approach to environmental stewardship.

The Lawrenceville School’s 6.1-MW solar farm provides 90% of the school’s energy needs. Photo courtesy of The Lawrenceville School. 

The system features 24,934 SolarWorld solar panels, manufactured at the company’s U.S. headquarters in Hillsboro, Ore., and mounted on single-axis trackers to maximize energy production. The array is designed to produce approximately 9,264,000 kilowatt hours of solar electricity each year, enough to power the equivalent of more than 800 typical American homes, and to offset 6,388 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions annually, the equivalent of taking 1,253 cars off the road. The Lawrenceville School solar farm is also home to nearly 900,000 resident honey bees, nourished by a special wildflower mixture planted among and around the solar panels.

SunWorks Power

CALIFORNIA STAKEHOLDERS REACH MOMENTOUS INTERCONNECTION RULE 21 SETTLEMENT

On March 16, 2012, fourteen parties to the Distribution System Interconnection Settlement Process filed a settlement in CPUC Rulemaking (R.)11-09-011.
The settling parties represent a wide range of interests, including the state’s three Investor-Owned Utilities, IREC and various other renewable energy advocacy groups and organizations, farm associations, environmental groups and others. Considering this diversity of interests, this settlement is a considerable achievement for all those involved.
The centerpiece of the settlement is a significantly reformed CPUC-jurisdictional Rule 21 interconnection tariff. Upon launching the settlement process for Rule 21 in August 2011, the CPUC’s goal was to craft transparent rules that provide a clear, predictable path to interconnection for distributed generation while maintaining the safety and reliability of the electric grid. Following are key provisions highlighting how the proposed reforms seek to accomplish that goal:
A “Fast Track” process is introduced and designed to build on Rule 21’s successful screening process for non-export and net energy metering customers, expanding Fast Track eligibility to exporting generating facilities up to certain size limits.
A national best practice for distributed generation penetration levels is introduced, under which aggregate interconnected generating capacity can be equal to 100% of minimum load on a distribution line section. This provision is the first of its kind in the U.S.
Specific, transparent time frames for each analysis track are proposed, ranging from simplified Fast Track review to the detailed Independent Study Process.
New rules under which distributed generation developers obtain and retain queue position are set out, including publication of an integrated queue by each investor-owned utility for exporting generating facility applicants at the distribution level.
A “Pre-Application Report” is proposed as a first look at a potential point of interconnection, to assist distributed generation developers with early identification of potential technical benefits or challenges of siting decisions.
New dispute resolution mechanisms are introduced that are designed to respond to developers’ needs, including a utility ombudsman authorized to address certain interconnection-related disputes, and expedited handling of timeline-related disputes by the CPUC’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Program.
The settlement is now undergoing Commission consideration within R. 11-09-011. The full settlement is available here: Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement Revising Distribution Level Interconnection Rules and Regulations, and includes the proposed reforms to Rule 21.
Read the rest of this entry »

The PV market will continue to consolidate but, so growth will continue, and prices for all of the main technologies will continue to drop.

 - The roof of Michelin's plant in Karlsruhe, Germany, has nearly a megawatt of solar on it, and the company's carport adds another 800 kilowatts.  Photo: Sputnik Engineering

The roof of Michelin’s plant in Karlsruhe, Germany, has nearly a megawatt of solar on it, and the company’s carport adds another 800 kilowatts.Photo: Sputnik Engineering

At the beginning of 2012, it is already clear that the forecast for market consolidation will hold true. Berlin-based Solon, one of the first players on the market, filed for bankruptcy at the end of the year, as did Solar Millennium, Which failed to transition from concentrated solar power to photovoltaics. Over in Ontario, Arise Solar Technologies, a manufacturer of crystalline solar cells in Waterloo, then threw in the towel, and Schott Solar cell production closed in Alzenau, Germany.

In the Netherlands, sold its cell manufacturer Solland cell plans in Heerven at the beginning of January. Even the biggest players are tightening their belts, seeking as Norway’s RAC, Which reduced wafer production in Glomfyord, and while SolarWorld is limiting its capacity and focusing its production within the U.S. on Hillsboro, where Solyndra and Evergreen Solar are still on everyone’s mind

Other signs of consolidation include the takeover of Hamburg-based manufacturer inverter volt solar works by Bosch. Voltwerk what part of the Conergy Group, Which is also struggling. The deal put desperately needed liquidity into the firm’s bank accounts, though the actual purchase price was not revealed. But the sale only gives some breathing room, Conergy, it does not solve all of its problems.

Global Boom

The other shiny side of the coin is that 2011 saw a breakthrough for the market in Asia, Australia, and North America. The plummeting price of photovoltaics has given firm’s giant international markets, especially for utility-scale projects. As a result, panel manufacturers are joining forces with project developers or coming up with their own EPC (engineering, procurement, and construction) departments. As Conergy and Q-Cells with their demo strated large solar farms in Asia, this combination holds the key to the future of Western solar manufacturers. And will this trend continue, not only internationally. (Heiko Schwarz Burger / Craig Morris)

Market Update 2012: Installations Grow to 38.3 GW in 2017 as the Market Goes Global
April 5th, 2012
Lux Research
Print This Post 
After recent explosive growth capped by a 66 per cent surge to 26.5 GW in 2011, solar installations will grind to a near halt this year — adding a mere 0.4 GW, totaling 26.9 GW of new installations — while industry revenues drop from $110 billion in 2011 to $92 billion in 2012 due to crashing prices. However, new installations rebound to 38.3 GW in 2017 as the industry learns to navigate a global market fast losing its subsidies, according to a Lux Research report.A supply glut, caused mainly by Chinese manufacturers, speculation of incentive cuts in Europe and the end of the 1603 Cash Grant in the US, fueled the sharp growth in installations last year.Lux Research analysts ran a levelized cost of energy (LCOE) analysis in 156 separate geographies, accounting for 82 per cent of the world’s population, calculating internal rates of return, to determine the viability and competitiveness of solar in each market. That model and methodology is part of the Lux Research Solar Demand Forecaster. Among their conclusions:
  • Emerging markets more than quadruple in size. Emerging markets will be both a battleground for suppliers and a source of great strength with South Asia accounting for the majority of growth, rising from 1 GW in 2011 to 4.5 GW in 2017. However, ASEAN, Africa and South America take the reins from 2017 to 2022, hurtling toward gigawatt status.
  • Utility-scale application segment grows. In large emerging markets like China, utility-scale solar will gain as conditions favor fewer, larger-scale projects that allow more control over financing and regulatory factors. This segment will grow from 6.3 GW globally in 2011 to 13.8 GW in 2017.
  • Oversupply still a possibility. Even the boom of 2011 was not sufficient to utilize all of the world’s module capacity, which reached 50 GW and pushed prices down to $1/W. With China’s 12th Five-Year plan calling for major expansions in solar capacity, global markets will still see strong downward price pressure.
  • Securitization boosts smaller installations. Asset-backed securities are spurring growth of the small-scale segment in the U.S. residential and commercial markets. Securitization and “renewable bonds,” which have been tested in the past by SunPower (in Italy), and Wells Fargo (in New Jersey), are likely to see widespread growth in 2012 or 2013. Expect major commercial banks like Citigroup to lead this effort.

The report, titled “Market Size Update 2012: The Push to a Post-Subsidy Solar Industry,” is part of the Lux Research Solar Systems and the Lux Research Solar Components Intelligence services.About Lux ResearchLux Research provides strategic advice and on-going intelligence for emerging technologies. Leaders in business, finance and government rely on us to help them make informed strategic decisions. Through our unique research approach focused on primary research and our extensive global network, we deliver insight, connections and competitive advantage to our clients. Visit http://www.luxresearchinc.com for more information.

California Free Solar
Free Solar Farms

Are you interested in hosting a solar farm on your property and earning a lucrative passive income for 20 years or longer? and at no cost to you ?

No cost – yes – zero cost – we pay you – you earn passive income – for 20 years or longer – with a long term lease backed by a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with your local electric utility – you get paid – there is no cost to you – only income – earn passive income

- contact California Free Solar

- become a Solar Farmer today

California Free Solar is located in the heart of the Great Central Valley in California. We are currently developing solar projects in California, India, and Jamaica. We are expanding into Nevada, Idaho, Arizona, New Mexico, and Australia and are seeking new partners.

Are you interested in other types of solar power installations? Commercial ? Rooftop ? Residential ?

For More information and to Qualify
Contact: California Free Solar

Send Email: kbettner.solar@gmail.com
Engineering & Technical Support: solarengineer@live.com

Solar Power Generation | Wind Power Generation | Business Development
Solar Panels | Technical Sales and Marketing | Solar Power | PV Solar
California Free Solar | Solar Power Plants | Free Solar Farms | PV
Solar Power Farms | Solar Panel | California Free Solar | Solar Farms

An article from the LA Times published in February 2012 follows below

Read the rest of this entry »

Tracie Cone, Associated Press

Thursday, November 10, 2011 

Fresno — Don’t call a photovoltaic power station a “solar farm” in front of Chris Scheuring.

“We all do a little spin, but calling it a ‘crop’ is like bad poetry in a sophomore English class,” says the California Farm Bureau attorney. “I should know what a crop is, and it doesn’t fit my definition of a crop.”

The question of when a farm is a farm is coming up often these days in California’s agricultural heartland, where the sunny days and wide open spaces that make it America’s most productive agricultural land are proving an irresistible mix to developers seeking to get in on the U.S. push for renewable energy.

Developers say that solar panels “harvest” the sun’s energy to turn into electricity, and that their 35-year life span is about the same as an almond orchard.

“I view this as a temporary use,” said developer Al Solis, as he made a pitch to the Fresno County Board of Supervisors last week to allow farmland planted in Asian vegetables to convert to solar.

The land rush is on, and to critics it looks like the leapfrog housing boom of the late 20th century that chopped up some agriculture regions into too-small pieces.

State laws to protect prime soils are being set aside by local governments eager to transform farm economies into the next big thing. And developers are finding it easier to persuade county boards of supervisors to tear up contracts designed to keep land in farming than to overcome obstacles placed by endangered species on undisturbed land that might be more suitable, like the non-protected portions of California’s expansive Mojave Desert.

The state needs an estimated 100,000 acres of solar arrays with today’s technology to meet its mandate that 33 percent of all energy be renewable by 2020.

“We are definitely on the leading edge of a wave of proposals for industrial solar energy on tens of thousands of acres of land,” Scheuring said. “It’s a real good time to get our signals straight about how we are going to do this on California’s landscape.”

A joint policy paper released Oct. 24 by the law schools at UCLA and UC Berkeley says that California must balance food security and energy production by identifying marginal farmland and guiding solar development to it or risk consequences. The state lost 200,000 acres of irrigated farmland to development between 2006 and 2008, and 1.3 million acres since 1984.

In Fresno County alone, where the $5.8 billion in annual agriculture production is often the highest of any U.S. county, the stakes are high. At least 32 applications for utility-scale solar projects are on file since the first one was approved in July, and four more are planned here by Pacific Gas & Electric, which gets its approval from the state. The result would be a patchwork of solar collectors scattershot across prime farmland.

Planners say they can’t recall ever having so many permit applications pending for one type of development, even in the heydays of the home-building boom.

“This is unique, and it’s pretty new,” said Will Kettler, Fresno County’s principal planner.

A bill signed in October by Gov. Jerry Brown could make marginal land far more attractive for development. The law will expedite the process by which poor soil can be developed with solar by allowing owners to more easily end their Williamson Act contracts, which grant lower tax rates in exchange for keeping the land in agriculture for 10 years.

The law should expedite development of the 30,000-acre Westlands Solar Park 60 miles southwest of Fresno, one project that has the support of the major environmental groups. All of the land is either of marginal quality or without a reliable water source, but is covered by hundreds of contracts that would have had to be undone individually.

“We can now move forward without any of the underlying risks associated with guessing how we are going to remove … private land under the Williamson Act,” said Daniel Kim, a principle in development.

Last week Scheuring filed a first-ever lawsuit hoping to close a loophole in the act, which says prime land can be developed only if no other suitable land is available. His immediate target is Fresno County, where the Board of Supervisors last month allowed the owners of 156 acres planted in melons and tomatoes to develop solar.

Critics of the supervisors’ decision point out that the region has 200,000 acres of retired land contaminated with selenium perfectly suited for sun energy.

Scheuring was motivated by an opinion from the California Department of Conservation, which advised Fresno County not to approve the project.

“There are 100,000,000,000 acres in the state and the sun shines abundantly on most of it,” the department wrote. “Electrical generation facilities do not necessarily have to be located on land with the best quality soil; however agricultural crops can only be grown on land with the best quality soil, which is a scarce and nonrenewable resource.”

Scheuring’s intent is to follow the case to the appellate level to force a statewide policy on solar development.

“It would be a strong signal to the solar industry to think more creatively about the task of siting these things within the existing mosaic of California land uses,” Scheuring said.

SOLAR INDUSTRY NEWS | MARCH 16, 2012 BY  

 

According to a March 14 report, the PV installations increased to a record 1,855 MW of capacity in 2011, up from 887 MW the previous year.

The U.S. Solar Market Insight: Year-in-Review 2011 report, from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and GTM Research, found that the U.S. solar industry grew by 109 percent from 2010 to 2011.

The U.S. market now makes up seven percent of PV globally, with a total value of over $8.4 billion in 2011. Last year’s installations represent enough installed capacity to power over 370,000 homes, bringing the cumulative solar capacity in the U.S. to a level enough to power almost a million homes.

GTM Research and SEIA attribute the record growth to the following factors:

  • lower installed PV system costs: costs dropped by 20 percent in 2011 due to lower component costs, improved installation efficiency, expanded financing options, and a shift toward larger systems nationwide
  • the expiration of the 1603 Treasury Program, which pushed project finalization before the Dec 31, 2011 expiration deadline
  • more utility-scale projects were completed in 2011 than ever before

“In 2011, the market demonstrated why the U.S. is becoming a center of attention for global solar,” said Shayle Kann, Managing Director of GTM Research’s solar practice.

“It was the first year with meaningful volumes of large-scale PV installations; there were 28 individual PV projects over 10 megawatts in 2011, up from only two in 2009. Furthermore, the market continued to diversify nationally; eight states installed more than 50 megawatts of solar each last year, compared to just five in 2010. These are all indicators of a vibrant market.”

But the report also highlighted problem areas in the U.S. market, including the impact of the expiration of 1603 Treasury and falling prices – with solar panel prices dropping over 50 percent during the year – on PV firms.

“As a result [of lower panel prices], multiple U.S. module manufacturing plants closed over the course of 2011. Despite these closures, U.S. module manufacturing capacity expanded 28% and production remained flat for the year when compared to 2010,” said the report.

Looking Ahead

SEIA and GTM Research are nevertheless positive about 2012, in part because of the many projects in the pipeline as part of the Section 1603 Treasury Program, most of which will be completed in 2012.

But the report notes that “2012 market size will still be largely determined by factors that have not yet been decided, such as the final outcome of the trade petition and market dynamics in Germany and Italy.”

The analysis also predicts that U.S. market share will increase over the next five years to almost 15 percent in 2016, when U.S. and China will be the leading markets as European markets slow down.

Regarding the political scrutiny surrounding the Solyndra bankruptcy, the report said “an industry blessed with overwhelming public support suddenly became a target for those who sought to admonish the loan guarantee program or clean energy policy in general.”

But SEIA and GTM Research still believe that the government support of the solar industry has been a success.

The report also addresses the brewing trade dispute with China spearheaded by SolarWorld, who filed a petition for tariffs to be applied to Chinese PV imports. “[I]t would be unreasonable to expect all (or even most) solar manufacturing to come from the U.S.,” the report said.

“The U.S. certainly has a role to play, but it will be over the next decade that the nature of that role will be determined. As the industry continues to mature, successful and sustainable companies will be separated from hopeful but ultimately unsuccessful ventures.”

Fri Mar 16, 2012

Reuters

ReneSola and China Sunergy  forecast higher shipments for the year as they pin their hopes on emerging solar markets such as China and India, but these less lucrative markets may not help lift up prices of solar products.

Most solar companies have indicated that they are moving to emerging solar markets to offset steep subsidy cuts in top markets Germany and Italy, but competition and paltry demand in markets such as China and India are squeezing margins.

Investors cheered ReneSola’s strong revenue and shipment forecast on Friday, sending its shares up as much as 23 percent on the New York Stock Exchange. The stock, which has lost 71 percent of its value in the last one year, touched a 4-week high of $3.02 on Friday.

China Sunergy shares reversed course to trade down 5 percent on theNasdaq after the company forecast a weak first quarter. The shares have lost 82 percent of their value in the last year.

The broader MAC Global Solar Energy Index .SUNIDX, which has fallen 61 percent this year, rose 1.4 percent on Friday.

For 2012, ReneSola expects total shipments at 1.8 gigawatt (GW) to 2 GW, up from 1.2 GW last year.

“We will maintain our position in Europe and expand our market share in high-potential markets including India, China and Australia,” China Sunergy Chief Executive Stephen Cain said in a statement.

China Sunergy estimates total shipments at about MW to 550 MW, up from the 420.3 MW it shipped last year.

“China Sunergy confidently expects that the Chinese market will make up 15 percent to 20 percent of our shipments in 2012,” a China Sunergy executive said on a call with analysts.

Peers such as Suntech Power Holdings (STP.N), JinkoSolar Holding Co (JKS.N), Canadian Solar Inc (CSIQ.O) and Hanwha SolarOne Co (HSOL.O) have also forecast higher shipments this year.

For the first quarter, ReneSola expects revenue of $180 million to $190 million, compared with analysts’ estimates of $155.5 million, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

REIGNING IN COSTS

Bigger peers such as First Solar (FSLR.O), Trina Solar (TSL.N) and Suntech have sought to reduce production costs to make the renewable power source less reliant on subsidies that make it competitive with fossil fuels.

On Friday, ReneSola said it will continue to invest heavily in production of polysilicon, the main raw material in the solar industry, in a bid to keep costs low and cope with pricing pressure.

To reduce the cost of making solar products, a number of companies have started in-house production of polysilicon.

ReneSola expects to spend $100 million this year to increase polysilicon production, a company executive said on a conference call with analysts.

China Sunergy said it expects prices of polysilicon to decline in 2012 and it will “stringently control costs.”

China Sunergy, which expects a net loss for the first quarter, believes weak demand and oversupply will continue to hurt its business in at least the first half of the year.

“The second quarter could be the worst quarter of the year,” a ReneSola executive said on the call.

He said the company expects prices to stabilize and even rise in the third quarter, leading to positive margins.

However, ReneSola expects an over-supplied market to last until 2013, pressuring prices.

Reporting by Vaishnavi Bala and Swetha Gopinath in Bangalore

Editing by Don Sebastian and Gopakumar Warrier


Solar Growth

As can be seen from the graph at the left, the solar industry has seen remarkable 2010 growth as a rebound from the recent recession. The bars represent the actual annual installed amount of PV solar systems by manufacturers expressed in giga-watts (1 GW = 1 billion watts). The approx-imate growth rate from 2007 to 2011 was 60% per year! For reference purposes, one nuclear reactor produces about 1.3 GW of electricity. The growth rate from 2009 to 2010 was a whopping 143%. We are forecasting 14% for 2011. The reason for the slowdown in 2011 is the reduction of incentives in several European countries. While the growth numbers are very impressive, the 20 giga-watts to be installed in 2011 is just a fraction of one percent of the total amount of electricity that will be generated this year by all sources. The forecast for 2011 and 2012 is a compilation of data from GTM Research, IMS Research, iSupply, and the author. After 2011, the long term growth estimates range from 20% to 30%.

 

There was about 35 GW of PV solar installed in the world at the end of 2010. It’s roughly divided into thirds as to that which comes from residential rooftops, from commercial buildings like hotels or malls, and from utility plants connected to the grid. The utility market has just recently been taking off. It is the market segment that has been the most influential in the growth rate over the last few years. Where solar makes a big difference is during the time of day when electricity is needed most, those hot summer afternoons when air conditioners are running almost constantly. This is when solar can add significant contributions to the grid at less cost than other sources. When you also throw in the pressure to go “green”, you can see why the future for this technology is bright.    Top

PV Solar Installations By Country

 Country 2009 2010 2011 2012
 Germany 3.8 7.3 6.5 5.8
 Italy 0.7 3.9 4.0 2.0
 United States 0.4 0.9 2.0 4.5
 Japan 0.5 1.0 1.4 2.0
 Czech Republic 0.5 1.2 0.5 0.2
 China 0.2 0.7 1.5 3.0
 India 0.0 0.1 0.8 1.2
 ROTW 1.1 2.4 3.3 5.3
 Total Market 7.2 17.5 20.0 24.0

As can be seen from the chart at the left, Germany is by far the leader in solar power. Germany has a goal to discontinue all nuclear power by the year 2020 and replace it with renewable resources. This goal prompted a government policy called feed-in-tariffs (FITs). A feed-in-tariff is a policy designed to encourage the adoption of renewable energy of all kinds to help accelerate the cost of renewables move towards grid parity. FITs typically include three provisions: 1) guaranteed grid access, 2) long-term contracts for the electricity produced, and 3) prices that are based on the cost of renewable energy generation with a downward trend towards grid parity. They include besides PV solar, other technologies such as concentrated solar power (CSP), wind, and geothermal.

 

In almost all of Africa, Pakistan, Hawaii, Italy and large portions of Japan, the price of electricity is already in excess of what the cost of electricity is from solar. Therefore there is a ready market for today’s solar electricity without any subsidies. As the price of solar electricity comes down every year, more and more locations will benefit from making the switch to solar when new capacity is added.

 

Other countries with major PV feed-in-tariff programs are Italy and Japan. These countries will help take up the growth slack from Germany who has achieved their initial goals and will be reducing incentives in the future. As can be seen above, the US is way behind in installations. The US has considered a feed-in-tariff but has yet to form a federal concensus to pass legislation. However, there are 14 US States and the District of Columbia that regulate retail electricity markets in which customers may choose “alternative” power suppliers. In addition, some states such as California and Arizona, have implemented their own aggressive incentive programs to encourage alternative power. The US, especially California and Arizona, have several extremely large installations in progress, which when finished will catapult the US into a major position internationally.   Top

Market Share Forecast By Region

Thin Film Market Share

Germany has over whelmingly dominated the worldwide solar markets the last few years. However, Germany has made the decision to ”gradually” reduce their feed-in-tariffs (FITs) over the next few years until the market price equals “grid parity”. See the chart to the left. This is causing a “redistribution”, but not a reduction in the total annual newly installed PV solar market. Spain has already reduced their FIT, but the rest of the EMEA (Europe, Middle East & Africa) is taking up the slack. China, Japan and the US are seeing dramatic growth. The big question is how much will the total market grow? 2011 is expected to grow about 15% due to the re-distribution mentioned above. After 2011, the long term growth estimates range from 20% to 30%.   Top

Market Share By Technology

Thin Film Market Share

The leader by far in thin film technology is First Solar whose cadmium telluride panel manufacturing costs are roughly one half those of crystalline cells. Crystalline wafers are about 200 microns (a micron = one millionth of a meter) thick. In contrast, thin-film panels are made by vacuum depositing several layers of semi-conductor materials only a few microns thick. Silicon in its pure form (99.9999% pure for solar applications) is very expensive and makes up about 50% of the cost of crystalline panels vs. the semiconductor cost of about 2% in thin film panels. However, thin film panels are not as efficient as crystalline panels and therefore more thin film panels are required to generate the same amount of electricity. A thin film installation can take up to 40 percent more space (and land) to achieve the same total power output as a premium crystalline installation. Thin film is strongest in the utility scale market because the cost of panels outweighs the cost of land in this market. Sharp and a few others are trying to make thin film silicon a success in the utility market.  On the other hand, Chinese suppliers using crystalline silicon are coming on strong. They operate on thinner margins and depend on huge volumes to get their costs down. In 2010 Suntech and JA Solar topped First Solar in cell shipments. Of the five top cell producers in 2010, four were Chinese using crystalline silicon.   Top

US PV Market Growth

Thin Film Market Share

Shown at the left are the recent annual solar installations in the US. Note that at the end of 2010 installations totaled 878 MW, a 102% increase over 435 in 2009. The previous annual growth rate from 2005 to 2009 was 38%. The US is forecast to grow 120% to about 2.0 GW in 2011 as utilities across the country come on strong. Up until now, utility installations have been weak due to lack of strong solar support from the Federal Government compared to Germany or Italy. In recent years state governments have taken up the slack and the results have begun to show during 2010.

 

The dark blue on the bottom of the bars represents the first quarter,, the medium blue is the 2nd quarter, the purple is the 3rd quarter, and the turquoise is the 4th quarter. In addition, preliminary data show that US installed prices have declined about 10% during 2010.

 

 

US PV Forecast By Market Segment

US Solar Installations Q3-2010

By the chart at the left, you can see that the utility sector demand is just starting to take off in the US. In the future, the utility sector will be the key sector of US solar growth.  One of the major barriers to utility growth has been financing. A 100 MW to 250 MW installation can cost from $1 billion to $2 billion dollars. Only the very largest banks and the US Government can afford that kind of money. The recent recession saw many banks reduce their lending policies and very few utility scale deals were done.

 

The Obama administration has agreed to guarantee up to 75% of the cost of some of the proposed large new installations. This has helped several large deals get off the ground. However, in order to satisfy the requirements that the loan will in fact be paid off, government due diligence has delayed quite a few projects. In addition, the 30% cash Treasury Grant Program (TPG) for renewable equipment was due to expire at the end of 2010. This has now been renewed until the end of 2011.At the end of 2010, 1179 solar projects had been helped by this program with funding of $1.3 billion. While this not a long term funding program (ala Germany), it will definitely help keep solar growing during 2011.   Top

US CSP Market Growth

US CSP Forecast

Shown on the left is the forecast for CSP (Concentrated Solar Power). In 2010 the demand for CSP was insignificant. However, there are several very large projects underway, especially in California and one in Arizona, that are very significant systems. CSP is almost exclusively a utility sector technology as it requires a conventional steam turbine to convert heat stored in liquid salt into electrical energy. See the Parabolic Trough Solar Systems section. The exception is Stirling type engines that do their own conversion. See Dish Stirling Systems section.

While trough systems do use some water (not excessive), they have two major advantages. First, they can be part of a hybrid system that shares the steam turbine system with an auxiliary gas fired front end turbine that can be used on cloudy days and at night. Secondly, they can store sunlight energy in the form of molten salt for up to an additional 6 hours which covers the peak demand period during the summer when people get home from work and turn on their air conditioners. Depending on a utility’s portfolio of electricity generators, these advantages can be very important. California has one 1,500 MW system and two 2,000 MW systems coming on stream in 2013, 2014 and 2015.

 

Generate solar power on your own land and earn $$$$$ with no cost to you at all. We provide the design, labor, and parts for your free solar farm. We are responsible for the installation and maintenance. A 20 year lease is required to benefit from the passive income generated by a solar farm on your property. Total income to the landowner during the 20 year lease period is substantial. Easy access to the land is necessary for construction and maintenance. Qualifying land needs to be adjacent to electric utility power distribution lines and within a specified distance of an electric utility substation. Contact California Free Solar for a free qualification today.

http://californiafreesolar.net/

Call California Free Solar now for more information:

(209) 233-1342

Solar Power Plant Project – How to Build a Solar Plant in 10 Steps

12 Apr, 2011

Solar Energy

Solar Power Plants have mushroomed in different parts of the world as Global Solar Demand has increased by more than 150% in 2010.Solar

Power Plants built on the Ground differ from that put on the Roofs of Houses as they require to go through feasibility,environmental assessment, grid connection, siting etc. which is typical for a large industrial project.

The time taken to build a solar power plant project is also much more than a rooftop residential solar installation.Solar Farms are being mainly being built in countries which have subsidy program like tax rebates,feed in tariffs etc.

However building a solar plant has become quite easy unlike in the past as solar panel, solar inverters and installation expertise is more easily available.

The regulations and permits for building a solar plant or a solar farm on the other hand differ from country to country and region to region depending on federal and state laws.

For a Large Solar Plant like the Aqua Caliente,there are a number of permitting steps that have to be passed before the plant can be built.For smaller power plants in the 5 MW range the requirements are less.In general the smaller the size of the solar installation,the lower the number of regulations required.

Here are the steps required in building a Solar Power Plant

1) Site Identification – Identifying a Suitable Site for Building the Solar Plant.Note the Area should not be heavily forested and have easy access to the Roads and the Power Grid.

2) Preliminary Financial Analysis – Preliminary Financial Feasibility with inputs like the Land Costs,Solar Insolation,Interconnection possibility with the Power Grid Operator

3) Land Leasing or Buying – After Step 2 has passed,then begins the Acquisition of the Land through Lease or Ownership.

4) Basic Engineering Design/Technology Selection – An Engineering Layout is prepared along with the Selection of the Technology and Vendors of Solar Equipment

5) Permitting – Various Permitting Procedures need to be followed in this Step.This is specific to an Area and can be quite cumbersome.For eg. in the USA the permitting involves very heavy costs forming almost 15-20% of the cost of a Solar Project.

6) Power Purchase Agreement – A Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) needs to be signed with the Power Utility who will buy the Electricity

7) Selection of EPC – A System Integrator or a Solar EPC Contractor is selected.  In case an EPC Contractor is selected then Solar Panels , Mounting and Inverters needs to be purchased if the Contract is not a Turnkey One

8) Financing of the Solar Project needs to be done.Note Solar Power Plants require a high initial investment with very low O&M costs.In general 60-80% of the Project is Debt Financed.

9) Testing and Connection to Grid -

After the Solar Plants is built,Testing of the Plant has to be done before it is connected to the Power Grid

10) Ongoing O&M – A Solar Plant has a life of between 25-30 years and requires minimal maintenance and monitoring.

Solar Inverters have to be replace after 10-15 years.

In case a Solar Module fails,it needs to be replaced as well as it degrades the performance of other Solar Panels. Note the Above Steps are a basic procedure for a Solar Power Project.It can be further be refined into more steps.

Summary Note

building a Solar Power Plant requiresProject Management skills typical of an industrial project with some unique characteristics.

The above steps are a simlistic procedure of a how to go about building a solar power plant.

The process in fact requires more detail and solid execution skills.A Solar Plant can be built in 3 months to 2 years depending on the expertise and the permitting required.

Note building a Solar Thermal Plant is much more time consuming typcially taking between 3-5 years.

by KURTIS 

MARCH 23, 2012

As with any new technology and when big corporations feel they are threatened they put up resistance. Problem is big corporations control Washington DC. Solar panel feed-in-tariffs are going to be the next big thing in this country. It is small business start ups and local governments though that cut the widest swath to success. In America Florida, Sacramento, California, and Palo Alto, California are saying we can’t wait and are pushing forward past the Feds.

Palo Alto California is calling its solar panel program a CLEAN program (Clean Local Energy Accessible Now) rather than what they considered the awkward term “Feed-in Tariff” or FIT.

It’s a pilot program for the City of Palo Alto Utilities the first year is capped at 4 megawatts and meant for medium-sized commercial rooftops with a minimum size of 50 kilowatts per installation. The FIT is applicable to solar panel only technology, although other renewable energy sources could be considered later on. The city will pay $0.14 per kilowatt-hour for 20-year contracts.

Palo Alto is arguably the heart of Silicon Valley, home to dozens of venture capital firms and thousands of new companies, and armed with a startup and innovation-friendly culture fueled by its immediate neighbor, Stanford University. The city itself has about 26,000 electric meters and a peak load of approximately 180 megawatts.

The program limits itself to medium and large commercial solar rooftops in the interest of keeping workload issues to a minimum in the early stages of this solar panel program.

The $0.14 per kilowatt-hour figure was based on the city’s avoided cost. Here’s the calculation:

$0.070 for energy
$0.034 green premium
$0.006 local capacity value, essentially avoided distribution grid costs
$0.019 avoided transmission access charges (TAC), an amount paid in California for every kilowatt-hour that is delivered from the transmission grid.
$0.006 avoided transmission losses
Total: $0.1355 per kilowatt-hour

So, the $0.14 per kilowatt-hour FIT price includes a $0.0045 premium and was agreed upon as a number that would attract developer interest. The cost of a fully subscribed program would be $29,000 per year; the city council estimates that the cost to the utility customer would be $0.01 per month. At this scale and modest cost, the city gains experience with the permitting, interconnection, metering, and billing process while developers gain experience in working with Palo Alto.

Craig Lewis, the Director of the Clean Coalition, a distributed generation advocacy group, attended the February 7 Palo Alto City Council meeting and commented that he saw this as “a good program, because it is constrained and not open to residential rooftops.” He added, “It delivers the trifecta of being cost-effective, timely, and environmentally sustainable, and the solar panel pilot program is designed for success by avoiding pitfalls like dealing with tax complications of residential-level projects.”

Jon Abendschein, Palo Alto’s Resource Planner, believes that $0.14 per kilowatt-hour is a price that will attract developers to the program.

Lewis added, “There are dozens of places around the United States developing the bling needed for CLEAN programs, and Palo Alto just set the stage for this critical movement to unleash Clean Local Energy Accessible Now.”

Detractors of feed-in tariffs have claimed that the prices can never be set at a proper rate and that auction mechanisms are a more equitable solution. Others have argued that having no solar panel subsidy at all is the right solution.

 Green Tech Media

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,642 other followers