Free Solar Farms

More Insights Into Solar and Utilities: Large-Scale Integration, Self-Ownership, and Net Metering

James Montgomery, Associate Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com 
June 05, 2013  |  5 Comments

   
Email
 
   
Share
 
11
   
LinkedIn
 
11
   
Facebook
 
23
 

Utilities integrated nearly 2.4 GW (AC) of solar electric capacity in 2012, a 61 percent increase from the ~1.5 GW that was added in 2011 and more than triple the 781 MW added in 2010, according to the U.S. Solar Electric Power Association (SEPA). The group officially released today the full version of its sixth annual Utility Solar Rankings report, which analyzes the amount of new solar power interconnected by U.S. electric utilities.

SEPA tracks more than 300,000 solar projects, which amount to 6.1 GW installed across the U.S. The group’s 2012 report spans more than 96 percent of the national solar electric power market and more than 260 of the most solar-active utilities. A few weeks ago we offered a sneak-peek at some of its findings, including the utilities who installed the most solar capacity (Pacific Gas and Electric was #1 yet again by a long shot) and the utilities making the most strides on a watts-per-customer basis (a lot of municipal utilities, led by ones in Ohio and Hawaii).

Diving deeper into SEPA’s full report illustrates some new nuggets:

  • Utilities purchased more than 1.1 GW of large-scale solar in 2012, defined as projects at least 5 MW in size. Large-scale solar made up 46 percent of all annual solar capacity, a 160 percent surge from 2012 (435 MW). With the first group of big concentrating solar power (CSP) projects expected to finally start coming online this year totaling 750 MW, large-scale projects alone should exceed 2012’s entire total of utility-integrated solar capacity.

    Note that in addition to the large-scale and net-metered projects (listed below) there’s a small slice of smaller-scale, non-net-metered projects that are residential or commercial in scale (less than 5 MW) that sell electricity back to the utility, sometimes by a feed-in tariff or by FERC mandate.

  • Utilities owned 12 percent of large-scale solar capacity and purchased the remaining 88 percent through power purchase agreements, which appears roughly equal to what it was in 2012. For overall solar capacity, utility ownership was around 7 percent, slightly down from 2012. This distinction between utility-owned solar vs. installed watts that are located in a utility’s area has been called out by some of our readers, who question just how committed utilities are to solar energy — particularly distributed solar energy.

    There are a number of reasons that a utility might choose to procure solar as opposed to owning it directly, points out Becky Campbell, senior research manager at SEPA. But the 12 percent utility ownership of large-scale solar “shows there’s a commitment,” she said. “They’re making a commitment whether it’s up-front capital or a long-term contract for the output.”

  • Utilities interconnected nearly 90,000 net-metered projects totaling 1,151 MW-ac. Net metering accounted for more than 99 percent of newly installed systems in 2012, but made up slightly less than half (48 percent) of the total installed solar capacity. There are about 3.5 GW of net-metered projects around the country, accounting for about 60 percent of the cumulative market, and 80 percent of that is in just five states: California, New Jersey, Arizona, Hawaii, and Massachusetts.

    The heart of the debate over net metering, typically pitting customers vs. utilities, involves how utilities recover from infrastructure investments, and whether net-metered customers are contributing less to those capital expenditures and shifts that burden to other ratepayers. In small quantities that doesn’t have a big impact, but it has a significant impact on big utilities like PG&E who have to integrate tens of thousands of NEM projects that are removed from that capital fund equation and potentially impact everyone’s rates. Campbell noted many utilities are exploring alternatives to the NEM question, exploring the value of solar with a full study of all its costs and benefits, assigning a value of a solar “tariff” and using that as a different mechanism than net metering — Austin Energy is an example of that.

Campbell also shed some light on an unexpected finding in this utility-solar study: Ohio, not exactly known for its solar resources, placed three utilities in the top 10 in terms of watts-per-customer. “We never would have suspected that Ohio would have such a strong presence,” she said. The explanation is that all three are members of American Municipal Power, an association of more than a hundred utility members spanning Ohio and Pennsylvania and four other states, which has made a strong commitment to solar and encouraged its members to do the same. That top-down message from AMP’s leadership seems to be influencing its members “to be a little more aggressive,” she said.

One last factoid: 2.4 GW in utility-integrated solar electric capacity is roughly equivalent to eight natural gas combined cycle power plants.

Lead image: Tick mark under solar battery via Shutterstock

5 COMMENTS

Warren McKenna
WARREN MCKENNA 
June 10, 2013
Net-metering is a failed model for the long-term solar market and the utility. We really need to treat RE as just another generation source. RE should have its own meter in parallel with the retail meter, using a buy-all sell-all approach. Using a Feed-in-Tariff that guarantees this connection, a contract term, and a fixed price. 

A FIT coupled with the current tax incentives could be minimal. A 10 year term at .10/kWhr should pay a system back in under 10 years.

Donald Osborn
DONALD OSBORN 
June 7, 2013
As a former utility manager, I can tell you that PV generation provides many direct benefits to the utility, the rate payers at large and to the electric grid itself as it has a rather good match to utility peak loads when such power is most needed and the most costly to produce and distribute. In crying “solar NEM is unfair to us”, the utilities are being disingenuous. As a dozen recent studies in as many states show, including CA, rooftop PV not only benefits the solar customer, but also results in net benefits to all ratepayers. It is only when the utilities put their thumbs on the scales by inflating the costs and neglecting many of the benefits of distributed PV generation can utilities argue that solar and net energy metering somehow is a shifting of costs from Solar customers to Non-solar customers. In fact, as with energy efficiency, solar generation benefits the entire range of customers, participating and nonparticipating alike, by providing not only clean renewable energy but energy when it is most needed and is most highly valued — during peak periods. As a significant part of an energy mix, solar brings real value to all of us.

NEAL ZISLIN
NEAL ZISLIN 
June 7, 2013
Avinash: 

There are two components to the cost of electricity; generation & transmission, distribution. The electricity that the utility company receives from net metered solar installations offsets its need to purchase electricity from the wholesale market. Every day utilities are buying and selling electricity in the wholesale market at the margin to balance contracted supply with demand of its customers. The net result of crediting its customers who are exporting solar generated electricity into the grid against the utility’s displaced (under contract) or avoided cost of purchased power is time-of-day dependent. The enduring subsidy to the net metered customer is the foregone revenue from distribution. However, that subsidy is being absorbed by the other ratepayers not the utility and its stakeholders.

AVINASH MEHROTRA
AVINASH MEHROTRA 
June 7, 2013
Does the report give details of the cost borne by the Utilities for Solar purchased under PPA from bulk producers as compared to the cost absorbed under “net-metering”? This information is extremely relevant to understand the future of net-metered solar energy (as in residential rooftop) as the differential cost between the two is the cost/benefit of net metering being subsidized/ earned by the utilities.

Peter Bradshaw
PETER BRADSHAW 
June 6, 2013
The data would seem to imply that only states with net-metering had any appreciable new system installations in 2012. If so, more places should be encouraged to offer net-metering, and installation %age limits on such metering should be discouraged. Time-of-day net metering is beneficial for solar systems, until all the peaking is supplied by solar systems,when the price differential might drop,of course.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

James Montgomery

James Montgomery

Jim is Associate Editor for RenewableEnergyWorld.com, covering the solar and wind beats. He previously was news editor for Solid State Technology and Photovoltaics World, and has covered semiconductor manufacturing and related industries,…

Stay Connected
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

 

MOST COMMENTED

  • 8
    Two Steps Forward, One Back: Ontario Cancels Feed-in Tariffs for Large Projects
  • 6
    Should Rooftop Solar Leasing Companies Be Treated as Utilities?
  • 5
    The Coming Solar Electricity Transformation
  • 3
    How to Talk Renewables so Farmers and Landowners Listen
  • SRECTrade, Inc.
  • Demand Energy
  • Enerquip
  • Intertek
  • REC Solar
  • DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability
  • Alternative Matters
  • Westinghouse Solar

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

CBS Denver

Find Denver news, Colorado news, Colorado weather forecasts and sports reports including Denver Broncos at CBSDenver.com.

Great Things from Small Things .. Nanotechnology Innovation

"The Wind and the Waves are Always on the side of the Ablest Navigators." - Edward Gibbon

MIT Environmental Policy and Planning

Graduate students and faculty in the Environmental Policy and Planning Group (EPP) are constantly involved in a range of applied research projects dealing with sustainable development, environmental regulation, collaborative adaptive management, ecosystem services, climate change, and water policy. The results of this research can be useful to planners and policymakers around the world.

GreenWorld

News, Views, & Musings for a Nuclear-Free, Carbon-Free future. This is a publication of Nuclear Information and Resource Service

African Grid Solutions

Powering African through clean alternative energy and microgrid

Snowgood's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

8wdee

Randomn Musings - All sorts! Whatever catches my fancy.

CHINDIA ALERT: You'll be living in their world, very soon

continuously updated blog about China & India

JBS News Renewable Energy

Power to the People!

Greenenergy2's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

create your energy power

solar outdoor lighting

Terra1 Communications

Renewable Resources, Cleantech, Investment

Go Green Tucson

Solar energy, wind energy, and othe alternative energy sources

John Brian Shannon

It's Your Right to be Informed

The Solar CA Blog of John Barnes

discussion of solar PV topics for large scale distributed generation

%d bloggers like this: